What goes in
The input is a workflow your team can describe: its trigger, information, tools, decisions, handoffs, exceptions, and definition of done. Examples show where work varies or needs human control.
Workflow agents
Workflow agents carry out a defined piece of work using approved tools and information, with people involved where judgment or authorization is required.
Discuss a projectFrom source to use
How it works.
- Map
Your team’s workflows
- Connect
Tools, decisions, and human review
- Run
Agents that carry out real work
How the agent is built
We map the work before connecting systems. Instructions, tool access, decision rules, and review points become explicit. Tests cover intended paths, missing information, stopping, and escalation.
What you receive
The result is an agent and operating workflow for a defined job. Deliverables can include connected tools, task logic, human review steps, and evaluation criteria.
Useful distinctions
Questions about workflow agents.
Which workflows are a good fit for an agent?
Good candidates have a clear objective, accessible inputs, repeatable actions, and an observable outcome. Important exceptions need deliberate review or escalation paths.
Where does human review belong?
Review belongs wherever context, risk, policy, or authorization makes an automatic decision inappropriate. Those points are designed into the workflow.
Can an agent use our existing tools?
Often, yes. Feasibility depends on the tool interface, permissions, data boundaries, and required actions. We assess those constraints during scoping.
Have a difficult project?